Cool. Note that keep-all should have left them hidden in rib-in, which can assist in troubleshooting such issues.
Regards -----Original Message----- From: Eric Van Tol [mailto:e...@atlantech.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 12:03 PM To: Harry Reynolds; juniper-nsp Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Missing BGP Routes > -----Original Message----- > From: Harry Reynolds [mailto:ha...@juniper.net] > Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 1:46 PM > To: Eric Van Tol; juniper-nsp > Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Missing BGP Routes > > Normally an as path loop or other sanity check results in this state. > From the config below does not seem this is the case. Perhaps add > keep-all, restart/soft clear session, and then display hidden. Perhaps > something will jump out. > > Does tracing show any errors when the routes are processed? > Unreachable next hop normally is just hidden so does not seem the case > here. Should not matter, but I normally doe not specify peer-as for an int group. > Again should not break things but worth trying w/o. > So, I tried tracing again and you all were correct. There was a BGP group on edge01 with the cluster-id of 192.168.206.129, which was causing the route to drop. I believe my problem with tracing was that I was not tracing the right information and using a prefix filter under the 'route' flag. Thanks to all who responded. I now know that routes with cluster-id issues will be dropped with no addition to the RIB. -evt _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp