Hi Matthias,
A customer of mine just installed 9.6R1.13 on 2 x J6350's doing
exactly what you describe (i.e. JunOS in "Routing" (non-secure mode),
doing a series of eBGP peering and some iBGP, some OSPF area 0.0.0.0
stuff, etc...) Works great - no issues.
9.6 Offers the possibility of doing mixed "flow-mode" and "packet-
mode" based on protocol, filter, or interfaces; meaning you can take
advantage of the "Security" based flow/services/ALGs etc. on a J,
while also enabling regular packet-mode throughput for the majority of
your traffic (thus not running into any scaling limitations in terms
of the session/flow table).
Regards,
- Chris.
On 2009-09-16, at 2:23 AM, Matthias Gelbhardt wrote:
Hi!
Interesting, they are recommend 9.6R1 für the J-series. Wouldn't
that be stupid, as I think Mark is right. Are old versions not so
stable on J-series?
On the other hand, the routers should only do routing and BGP,
nothing more, nothing less.
Matthias
Benny Sumitro schrieb:
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp