I run the same version pretty much on the same setup, eBGP peering and some iBGP, and OSPF on 6350's. Also 9.6 versions, includes a number of bug fixes, including a crash bug (I don't remember the PR on it) which I actually run into back in July.
Regards, George -----Original Message----- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Kawchuk Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 10:07 AM To: Matthias Gelbhardt Cc: juniper-nsp Subject: Re: [j-nsp] software version to use? Hi Matthias, A customer of mine just installed 9.6R1.13 on 2 x J6350's doing exactly what you describe (i.e. JunOS in "Routing" (non-secure mode), doing a series of eBGP peering and some iBGP, some OSPF area 0.0.0.0 stuff, etc...) Works great - no issues. 9.6 Offers the possibility of doing mixed "flow-mode" and "packet- mode" based on protocol, filter, or interfaces; meaning you can take advantage of the "Security" based flow/services/ALGs etc. on a J, while also enabling regular packet-mode throughput for the majority of your traffic (thus not running into any scaling limitations in terms of the session/flow table). Regards, - Chris. On 2009-09-16, at 2:23 AM, Matthias Gelbhardt wrote: > Hi! > > Interesting, they are recommend 9.6R1 für the J-series. Wouldn't > that be stupid, as I think Mark is right. Are old versions not so > stable on J-series? > > On the other hand, the routers should only do routing and BGP, > nothing more, nothing less. > > Matthias > > Benny Sumitro schrieb: _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp