Mine here at home has been working well, with the internal ADSL2. Only initial issue I had were the dumb MTU and MSS defaults.
Only time it gets rebooted is when I pull the wrong cord.... Now I need to fix DDNS. Had it working on 10.1, but 10.4 and 11.x break it again. On Sep 1, 2011, at 1:09 PM, Nathan Sipes wrote: 10.4R2 and 11.1R2 The local interzone traffic continued to forward and traffic sourced from the outside interface continued to work. On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Paul Stewart <p...@paulstewart.org> wrote: > We have yet to see that even with PIM modules installed – do you remember > what version of JunOS you were running by chance?**** > > ** ** > > Paul**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Nathan Sipes [mailto:nathan.si...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* September-01-11 12:05 PM > *To:* Paul Stewart > *Cc:* juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > *Subject:* Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS 10.4S6 for EX8200 - PR/676826**** > > ** ** > > I have had similar experiences to Richard's with the "Free SRX210H" I even > managed to get a DSL PIM in there as well. Had it up and working for about 2 > months when the pim quit forwarding traffic randomly. Rebooting the SRX > seems to fix it well enough though... I will say that the free hardware has > cost a lot of my time and some annoyed phone calls from my wife when netflix > doesn't work. **** > > > > **** > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Paul Stewart <p...@paulstewart.org> wrote: > **** > > Actually I'm curious as well - RAS is not typically wrong though about this > kind of stuff ;) > > We have numerous SRX deployed for firewall and router functionality - some > are running Dynamic VPN (which yes, we've had issues with - definitely it's > not perfect). We've been bitten by some surprises as well ... so I'm not > disagreeing, just saying that we're pretty used to these issues we've > encountered and don't deploy if we know they will come up. Typically, we > use > them as site to site VPN boxes along with firewalling. > > I have an SRX210 at my home as well - run the full UTM suite on it and had > no real issues (granted it's a home environment to be fair). > > RAS, can you share a few highlights of "broken"? > > Appreciate it, > Paul > > > -----Original Message----- > From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers > Sent: September-01-11 11:35 AM > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS 10.4S6 for EX8200 - PR/676826**** > > > On 01/09/11 10:09, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > >> I have an SRX210 in my basement doing my home routing, and it is the >> only free device I've ever been given that I would seriously consider >> returning and asking for my money back. Broken doesn't even begin to >> describe it, my condolences to anyone who actually needs to run these >> things in production. > > Is this for routing functionality, or firewall functionality? > > We're using one as an MPLS PE, and it seems to be working ok, but given > what you've said... gulp! > > Is there a good summary of the problems anywhere, or do I need to trawl > the archives? > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp**** > > ** ** > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp