Yep, the FTP ALG has been a real dark and sinister sadist for a while. On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Scott T. Cameron <routeh...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I have 2x chassis cluster with SRX3400s. > > ALGs will destroy your soul. Avoid at all costs. > Chassis cluster upgrades are needlessly painful (imo). > Session counts can become exhausted very easily and lead to a very quick > and > dreadful DOS. > > Most of my early adopter issues have disappeared with updates over time and > the software is quite stable for me in the past 6 months. > > Scott > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Brent Jones <br...@servuhome.net> wrote: > > > > > I run multiple SRXs at several sites doing firewalling, routing, VPNs. > > Have everything from SRX100s, to SRX 1400s, branch units run 10.4R6 I > > believe, and SRX1400s running 11.1R3 (will double check later). > > Have had minor issues, mainly with VPNs to other vendor devices like > > Cisco ASAs. You have to be mindful if you need policy based VPN or > > route based VPNs to work with other vendors. > > > > I'd be curious to hear what problems other people have, for something > > to look out for, but otherwise the SRXs have worked as well as most > > anything else on the market. > > I would know, I've gone through the whole lifecycle of Cisco PIX, into > > ASAs, Sonicwall, Fortigate, etc, and I would say SRXs have worked > > better than most, especially considering they are a young product > > line. > > > > > > -- > > Brent Jones > > br...@servuhome.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp