On 7 November 2011 14:10, Phil Mayers <p.may...@imperial.ac.uk> wrote:
>> What are others doing to deal with the "flow" issues associated with
>> more recent versions of code?
>
> We simply upgraded the RAM and forced packet mode.
>
> Interestingly, we're toying with the idea of using the little SRX2xx series
> devices in place of J-series. They're a LOT smaller than the (enormous!)
> J-Series and seem to us to be no worse. We've got a couple in service and
> they work fine.

  I was a little surprised at the throughput of the SRX220 in packet
mode.  Only 496Mbps bidirectional at 1500bytes, and drops to 72Mbps at
64bytes.  It IS a security device of course, not a router strictly
speaking, so I admit my hopes were a little high.


>> I'm interested in knowing how others have tackled these challenges
>> for customers with hundreds of these in the field.
>
> Well, we don't have hundreds... in that case, the RAM/flash upgrades will
> take a tedious amount of time.
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to