we have a remote cluster, hence no direct connection is provided but a switched connection (through L2 infrstructure - a vlan basically) yes dual REs why do you suppose a problem on fabric links ?
> From: obri...@missouri.edu > To: dim0...@hotmail.com > CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX5k problem > Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 14:19:35 +0000 > > Failover works fine on my 5800 cluster. I use direct connections for fabric > and control. > It sounds like you're losing traffic in Zmode. I'd start by taking a serious > look at your fabric links. > Do you have dual REs in each chassis for the double control links? > > > On Sep 3, 2013, at 7:34 AM, R S wrote: > > > We are having a geographic SRX5800 chassis cluster with two > > redundancy-groups (RG0 and RG1). > > > > We are having many issues while performing the failover of the RG1, with > > and without preemption. The issue is that when the RG1 becomes active on > > the node1, real traffic is being lost. Also with preemption, when the node0 > > becomes again the active for the RG1, lot of traffic is lost. > > > > There are dual Ctrl and Fabric link both through a Layer2 infrastructure, > > one couple through MX960 and one couple through EX8200. > > > > Any similar nightmare ? > > > > Tks > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
