There's no need to run "protocols ldp" ? -- Eduardo Schoedler
2014-11-12 17:18 GMT-02:00 Alexander Arseniev <arsen...@btinternet.com>: > There is a line missing on MX side: > > set interfaces lt-0/0/0.0 family ccc > > Thanks > Alex > > 12/11/2014 16:51, Raphael Mazelier wrote: >> >> >> >> Le 11/11/14 22:29, chip a écrit : >>> >>> http://pastebin.com/YYfHk9M2 >>> >>> That should get you. *Caveats apply* but it does work =) >>> >>> --chip >>> >> >> >> Thks you chip. >> >> With your configuration I've made some progress. >> Now I've got some arp replies on the CE connected to the EX : >> >> 2.1.1.5 > 2.1.1.6: ICMP echo request, id 26654, seq 11, length 64 >> 17:42:39.031721 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4), Request who-has >> 2.1.1.5 tell 2.1.1.6, length 46 >> 17:42:39.031731 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4), Reply 2.1.1.5 is-at >> 78:2b:cb:28:2d:55, length 28 >> >> The lt mac is correctly learn on the CE. >> But for one reason or another the mac address of the ce is not learn on >> the mx80 side ?! >> >> >> I'm just out of luck for this setup :( >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Eduardo Schoedler _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp