Might reach out to your Juniper SE.. I believe they have some internal “gold configs” for different sized ISPs that have been well tested internally. One of their configs might make a good base to start from.
> On Mar 24, 2016, at 6:57 PM, Matthew Crocker <matt...@corp.crocker.com> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > What is the current best practice for carrying full tables in MX series > routers? I have 3 new MX480s coming soon and will use them to rebuild my > core network (currently a mix of MX240 & MX80 routers). MPC-NG (w/ 20x1g & > 10x10g MICS )& RE-S-X6-64G-BB. > > I’m running MPLS now and have full tables in the default route instance. > Does it make more sense (i.e. more secure core) to run full tables in a > separate virtual-router? I’ve been doing this small ISP thing for 20+ years, > Cisco before, Juniper now, I’ve always bashed my way through. > > Looking for a book, NANOG presentation or guide on what is current best > practice with state of the art gear. > > MPLS? BGP? IS-IS? LDP? etc. > > The network is a triangle (A -> B -> C -> A), MX480 at each POP, 10g > connections between POPs, 10g connections to IX & upstreams. Most customers > are fed redundantly from A & B > > Thanks > > -Matt _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
