Aaron, Just wondering if you company compared any other products from other vendors against the ACX5048? Is there anything else on the market with this high of port count, for this low of a price, with this amount of features?
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Aaron <aar...@gvtc.com> wrote: > Thanks Raphael, > > My core links are untagged typically... in rare case I'll tag, and it > doesn't seem to be a problem, I haven't done that on acx5048 yet > > Ok I did MEF EPL (eline port based carrying any and all vlans, tagged and > untagged...) works. I shut and deactivate core bgp for this test to prove > that it's purely igp, mpls, ldp to make it work. Ce-ce pings and > l2protocols seem to be fine ( I tested cdp and stp for CE to CE and it's > fine )...of course the config's below are the MPLS PE's... the ce's I > mention are not shown anywhere here. > > > ---3600 > > interface GigabitEthernet0/15 > > switchport trunk allowed vlan none > > switchport mode trunk > > load-interval 30 > > service instance 1 ethernet > > encapsulation default > > l2protocol forward > > xconnect 10.101.12.245 999 encapsulation mpls > > --- ACX5048 > > set protocols l2circuit neighbor 10.101.12.251 interface ge-0/0/38.0 > virtual-circuit-id 999 > > set interfaces ge-0/0/38 encapsulation ethernet-ccc > > set interfaces ge-0/0/38 unit 0 family ccc > > - Aaron > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
