MX204 is probably not that expensive compared to a fully licensed MX104, I guess. And while MX204 doesn't have RE redundancy, it supports NSR so I understand it runs two JunOS VMs in a Windriver Linux as hypervisor, I guess.
> On 5 janv. 2018 à 15:54, Edward Dore <edward.d...@freethought-internet.co.uk> > wrote : > > The MX204 seems to be amazing value for money if it has the right port > combination for your workload (i.e. not great if you need lots of 1GE). The > RE is also significantly more capable than the somewhat underpowered one in > the MX104. > > For our use case (border router terminating peering/transit), having dual RE > isn’t particularly important as we achieve our redundancy using separate > routers. YMMV. > > From: Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> > Date: Friday, 5 January 2018 at 14:42 > > I believe this is what we are finding as well, which is unfortunate. Maybe > we should look at the MX204 instead? Although, it's 2X the cost (MSRP) and > only has one RE. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
