Hi, While PPC is clearly slower than x86 stuff, the problem is that JunOS should have never been compiled for this architecture. I suppose/hope that the product manager who took such decision is now in a madhouse.
As Saku Ytti wrote in NANOG ML in 2014 (when comparing Cisco 6500/7600 and MX80/104): « if we compare MX80 and RSP720, where RSP720 has slightly lower performance CPU, RSP720 out-performs MX80 (and MX104) in BGP convergence and BGP scale. » > On 11 apr. 2018 at 00:04, Chuck Anderson <c...@wpi.edu> wrote : > > MX104 and MX80 are PPC chips, not Intel. That is a big reason why > they are slow. I have problems like VRRP flapping due to CPU > starvation. This is in a lab, so it doesn't matter too much, but I > wouldn't want to put them into a production network. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
