Btw, it's a very good question if anyone here has more or less close to real-world experience with L3 gw and evpn type 5 routes on QFX5110 or maybe any other trident 2+ based box.
Would much appreciate your input. Regards, Pavel July 3, 2018, 18:48 Roger Wiklund <roger.wikl...@gmail.com>: > Hi Scott > > Should be fine as L2 GW. L3 GW and Route Type 5 support is quite recent. > > Beefier alternatives are QFX10002, or MX204 if you want to go MX route with > fewer ports. Both have custom ASICs with higher scale, and higher chance to > overcome caveats/limitations especially tied to chipset limitation. > > Regards > Roger > > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Scott Harvanek <scott.harva...@login.com> > wrote: > > > Is anyone on here running 5110s for VXLAN/VTEP/EVPN and run into any > > issues? I’ve gone over the caveats list Juniper has for these in regards > > to what they won’t do in regards to VXLAN and it seems like they meet our > > needs… just curious if anyone has run into any lesser documented issues > > with them. > > > > I’m looking at the list here; https://www.juniper.net/ > > > documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/vxlan-constraints-qfx-series.html > > <https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/vxlan- > > constraints-qfx-series.html> > > > > Is there a better device for VXLAN on the juniper side? We’re looking for > > something comparable to the Nexus 9372 on the Cisco side. > > > > Cheers! > > > > Scott H > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
