Are the QFX5200/QFX5210 also only layer 2 EVPN-VXLAN?
On 8/7/2018 1:42 PM, Richard McGovern wrote:
Correct. For this functionality one needs either a 10K/MXPTX or EX9200 at current time. These situations may also require EVPN-MPLS, versus EVPN-VXLAN. QFX5110 is limited to EVPN-VXLAN at least today. QFX5100 provide L2 only EVPN-VXLAN. Thanks for pointing this out. On 8/6/18, 12:40 PM, "Mike Gonnason" <gonna...@gmail.com> wrote: Be aware on the QFX5110 that L3 VXLAN is limited, You cannot route vxlan to vlan: https://prsearch.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=prcontent&id=PR1318178On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 3:51 PM Brant Ian Stevens <bra...@argentiumsolutions.com> wrote:> And now there's the announcement of the QFX5120 and EX4650 to the mix.> Those are Trident-3 based, if I am not mistaken. Boxes look great on > paper... > > -- > Regards, > -- > Brant I. Stevens, Principal & Consulting Architect > bra...@argentiumsolutions.com > d:212.931.8566, x101 <(212)%20931-8566>. m:917.673.6536 <(917)%20673-6536>. > f:917.525.4759 <(917)%20525-4759>. > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__argentiumsolutions.com&d=DwIFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=cViNvWbwxCvdnmDGDIbWYLiUsu8nisqLYXmd-x445bc&m=eVWy_z1Tt_vOBqrVgHiM_dtKdycFG7efWLRFNxJndQk&s=OmeaqZQV835ARTQIMsk32-c0AQ4PSf50LLpVss0TzuM&e= > > On 7/4/18 5:03 PM, Scott Harvanek wrote: > > Cost is a factor I don’t think I can get anyone to bite on something > bigger either as the application is solely VXLAN in a compact form factor. > > > > -Scott H > > > >> On Jul 4, 2018, at 2:20 PM, Pavel Lunin <plu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Btw, it's a very good question if anyone here has more or less close to > real-world experience with L3 gw and evpn type 5 routes on QFX5110 or maybe > any other trident 2+ based box. > >> > >> Would much appreciate your input. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Pavel > >> > >> July 3, 2018, 18:48 Roger Wiklund <roger.wikl...@gmail.com>: > >>> Hi Scott > >>> > >>> Should be fine as L2 GW. L3 GW and Route Type 5 support is quite > recent. > >>> > >>> Beefier alternatives are QFX10002, or MX204 if you want to go MX route > with > >>> fewer ports. Both have custom ASICs with higher scale, and higher > chance to > >>> overcome caveats/limitations especially tied to chipset limitation. > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> Roger > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Scott Harvanek < > scott.harva...@login.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Is anyone on here running 5110s for VXLAN/VTEP/EVPN and run into any > >>>> issues? I’ve gone over the caveats list Juniper has for these in > regards > >>>> to what they won’t do in regards to VXLAN and it seems like they meet > our > >>>> needs… just curious if anyone has run into any lesser documented > issues > >>>> with them. > >>>> > >>>> I’m looking at the list here; https://www.juniper.net/ > >>>> > documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/vxlan-constraints-qfx-series.html > >>>> < > https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/vxlan- > >>>> constraints-qfx-series.html> > >>>> > >>>> Is there a better device for VXLAN on the juniper side? We’re looking > for > >>>> something comparable to the Nexus 9372 on the Cisco side. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers! > >>>> > >>>> Scott H > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > >>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_juniper-2Dnsp&d=DwIFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=cViNvWbwxCvdnmDGDIbWYLiUsu8nisqLYXmd-x445bc&m=eVWy_z1Tt_vOBqrVgHiM_dtKdycFG7efWLRFNxJndQk&s=yjHoZdiJRmtZlTtQ9QIzFlqKEkKQX5MxD-94nTWLrWs&e= > >>>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_juniper-2Dnsp&d=DwIFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=cViNvWbwxCvdnmDGDIbWYLiUsu8nisqLYXmd-x445bc&m=eVWy_z1Tt_vOBqrVgHiM_dtKdycFG7efWLRFNxJndQk&s=yjHoZdiJRmtZlTtQ9QIzFlqKEkKQX5MxD-94nTWLrWs&e= > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_juniper-2Dnsp&d=DwIFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=cViNvWbwxCvdnmDGDIbWYLiUsu8nisqLYXmd-x445bc&m=eVWy_z1Tt_vOBqrVgHiM_dtKdycFG7efWLRFNxJndQk&s=yjHoZdiJRmtZlTtQ9QIzFlqKEkKQX5MxD-94nTWLrWs&e= > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_juniper-2Dnsp&d=DwIFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=cViNvWbwxCvdnmDGDIbWYLiUsu8nisqLYXmd-x445bc&m=eVWy_z1Tt_vOBqrVgHiM_dtKdycFG7efWLRFNxJndQk&s=yjHoZdiJRmtZlTtQ9QIzFlqKEkKQX5MxD-94nTWLrWs&e= >_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
