They are both planned to support L3, but probably not day 1. QFX5200/QFX5210,
both shipping products, are L2 only today. L3 VXLAN support will probably
require RIOT – recycle packet. These platforms are Broadcom based so
limitation is a Broadcom limitation.
Hope this helps.
On 8/7/18, 1:50 PM, "Brian Rak" <b...@gameservers.com> wrote:
Are the QFX5200/QFX5210 also only layer 2 EVPN-VXLAN?
On 8/7/2018 1:42 PM, Richard McGovern wrote:
> Correct. For this functionality one needs either a 10K/MXPTX or EX9200
at current time. These situations may also require EVPN-MPLS, versus
EVPN-VXLAN. QFX5110 is limited to EVPN-VXLAN at least today. QFX5100 provide
L2 only EVPN-VXLAN.
>
> Thanks for pointing this out.
>
> On 8/6/18, 12:40 PM, "Mike Gonnason" <gonna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Be aware on the QFX5110 that L3 VXLAN is limited, You cannot route
vxlan to
> vlan:
>
https://prsearch.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=prcontent&id=PR1318178
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 3:51 PM Brant Ian Stevens <
> bra...@argentiumsolutions.com> wrote:
>
> > And now there's the announcement of the QFX5120 and EX4650 to the
mix.
> > Those are Trident-3 based, if I am not mistaken. Boxes look great
on
> > paper...
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > --
> > Brant I. Stevens, Principal & Consulting Architect
> > bra...@argentiumsolutions.com
> > d:212.931.8566, x101 <(212)%20931-8566>. m:917.673.6536
<(917)%20673-6536>.
> > f:917.525.4759 <(917)%20525-4759>.
> >
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__argentiumsolutions.com&d=DwIFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=cViNvWbwxCvdnmDGDIbWYLiUsu8nisqLYXmd-x445bc&m=eVWy_z1Tt_vOBqrVgHiM_dtKdycFG7efWLRFNxJndQk&s=OmeaqZQV835ARTQIMsk32-c0AQ4PSf50LLpVss0TzuM&e=
> >
> > On 7/4/18 5:03 PM, Scott Harvanek wrote:
> > > Cost is a factor I don’t think I can get anyone to bite on
something
> > bigger either as the application is solely VXLAN in a compact form
factor.
> > >
> > > -Scott H
> > >
> > >> On Jul 4, 2018, at 2:20 PM, Pavel Lunin <plu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Btw, it's a very good question if anyone here has more or less
close to
> > real-world experience with L3 gw and evpn type 5 routes on QFX5110
or maybe
> > any other trident 2+ based box.
> > >>
> > >> Would much appreciate your input.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Pavel
> > >>
> > >> July 3, 2018, 18:48 Roger Wiklund <roger.wikl...@gmail.com>:
> > >>> Hi Scott
> > >>>
> > >>> Should be fine as L2 GW. L3 GW and Route Type 5 support is
quite
> > recent.
> > >>>
> > >>> Beefier alternatives are QFX10002, or MX204 if you want to go
MX route
> > with
> > >>> fewer ports. Both have custom ASICs with higher scale, and
higher
> > chance to
> > >>> overcome caveats/limitations especially tied to chipset
limitation.
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards
> > >>> Roger
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Scott Harvanek <
> > scott.harva...@login.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Is anyone on here running 5110s for VXLAN/VTEP/EVPN and run
into any
> > >>>> issues? I’ve gone over the caveats list Juniper has for
these in
> > regards
> > >>>> to what they won’t do in regards to VXLAN and it seems like
they meet
> > our
> > >>>> needs… just curious if anyone has run into any lesser
documented
> > issues
> > >>>> with them.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I’m looking at the list here; https://www.juniper.net/
> > >>>>
> >
documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/vxlan-constraints-qfx-series.html
> > >>>> <
> >
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/vxlan-
> > >>>> constraints-qfx-series.html>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Is there a better device for VXLAN on the juniper side? We’re
looking
> > for
> > >>>> something comparable to the Nexus 9372 on the Cisco side.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Cheers!
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Scott H
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > >>>>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_juniper-2Dnsp&d=DwIFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=cViNvWbwxCvdnmDGDIbWYLiUsu8nisqLYXmd-x445bc&m=eVWy_z1Tt_vOBqrVgHiM_dtKdycFG7efWLRFNxJndQk&s=yjHoZdiJRmtZlTtQ9QIzFlqKEkKQX5MxD-94nTWLrWs&e=
> > >>>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > >>>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_juniper-2Dnsp&d=DwIFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=cViNvWbwxCvdnmDGDIbWYLiUsu8nisqLYXmd-x445bc&m=eVWy_z1Tt_vOBqrVgHiM_dtKdycFG7efWLRFNxJndQk&s=yjHoZdiJRmtZlTtQ9QIzFlqKEkKQX5MxD-94nTWLrWs&e=
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > >
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_juniper-2Dnsp&d=DwIFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=cViNvWbwxCvdnmDGDIbWYLiUsu8nisqLYXmd-x445bc&m=eVWy_z1Tt_vOBqrVgHiM_dtKdycFG7efWLRFNxJndQk&s=yjHoZdiJRmtZlTtQ9QIzFlqKEkKQX5MxD-94nTWLrWs&e=
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> >
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_juniper-2Dnsp&d=DwIFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=cViNvWbwxCvdnmDGDIbWYLiUsu8nisqLYXmd-x445bc&m=eVWy_z1Tt_vOBqrVgHiM_dtKdycFG7efWLRFNxJndQk&s=yjHoZdiJRmtZlTtQ9QIzFlqKEkKQX5MxD-94nTWLrWs&e=
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_juniper-2Dnsp&d=DwIDaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=cViNvWbwxCvdnmDGDIbWYLiUsu8nisqLYXmd-x445bc&m=VosnQNEktEZivIXiI5x2lxQsnGjxFpQ5Pjnk8G_25HY&s=KJv4T2qgnBVa82KJgpbsZmIV7tvcjeLqSaU_nfFLoNk&e=
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
