Pavel Lunin wrote: > > > in a virtual chassis you could add: > > > > > > set virtual-chassis no-split-detection > > > > > > This will ensure that if both VC ports go down, the master routing > > engine carries on working. > > > > Are you referring to "Scenario B" in > > https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB13879 ? > > or a different case? > > > > > I don't like to explain what others say but I think yes. It's been known > behavior since always: in a two-member VC always disable split-detection. > You can google for other threads on this in this list. > > It's always been kind of poorly documented. Last time I checked the docs, > instead of just writing clearly that it must be disabled in two-members > mode, they "don't recommend" it with some kind of hand-waving explanation > that if you estimate that the backup RE failure probability is higher that > a split-brain condition blah-blah-blah... Just disable split-detection, > that's it :)
Tomorrow we are planning a lab with and without split-detection. I hope this solves the issue for us, and if it does, I'm sure to make a note in my engineering journal. Thank you Catalin and Pavel for your input. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN AS43859 _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
