On 27/Aug/18 18:39, craig washington wrote:
> Hello all.
>
> Wondering if anyone is using MPLS with IPV6?
>
> I have read on 6PE and the vpn counterpart but these all seem to take into
> account that the CORE isn't running IPV6?
>
> My question is how can we get the ACTUAL IPV6 loopback addresses into inet6.3
> table? Would I need to do a rib import for directly connected?
>
> If you run "ipv6-tunneling" this seems to only work if the next-hop is an
> IPV4 address. (next-hop self)
>
> I also messed around with changing the next-hop on the v6 export policy to
> the IPV4 loopback and this works too but figured there should be a different
> way?
>
> So overall, I am trying to find a way for v6 routes to use the same LSP's as
> v4 without changing the next hop to a v4 address.
LDPv6 is your friend.
We have a dual-vendor network with varying levels of LDPv6 support, so
we haven't tested this in the real wild.
Mark.
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
