Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: > > As far as I know, DLR does nothing for type resolution across > languages because it's...you know...dynamic :) > Haven't looked at DLR in a while, but it allowed language impls to build IL by building expression trees, including handling all kinds of naughty business with debugger metadata etc. So at least that kind of boilerplate seems to be shared - which is already miles ahead of what's shared in the JVM language world (ie. nuthin').
Note: take with a grain of salt, as I said: been ages since I looked at the DLR. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.
