Charles Oliver Nutter schrieb: [...] > So what's the deal, folks? Anyone else interested in this? Can we > cannibalize an existing compiler and make the type > provision/requisition logic per-language-pluggable?
We can try. I think a common approach would serve a high purpose in the matter that type inferencing could be done on a higher level and there are different ways to this as well. If you want to, we can try using the Groovy compiler for the cannibalization. It would me for Groovy 2.0, in which I want to do a big rewrite of many parts anyway. But the AST we use is quite complex and the design is not best in all parts. So maybe there is a better AST out there. At last with the Groovy AST I know how to do things ;) bye Jochen -- Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou The Groovy Project Tech Lead (http://groovy.codehaus.org) http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.
