On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Miles Sabin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Jochen Theodorou <[email protected]> wrote: >> Charles Oliver Nutter schrieb: >> [...] >>> I'm not even sure a common AST is required. Maybe I'm not making >>> myself clear enough? >> >> but then what of the compiler you want to cannibalize? > > Each language that wants to play has to contribute it's own > type-wrangling component. We need one for Java, one for Scala, one for > JRuby, one for Groovy, etc. ...
I'm still not grasping this. Could you sketch one of these? My mind works better with concrete/operational examples these days. > > Cheers, > > > Miles > > -- > Miles Sabin > tel: +44 (0)7813 944 528 > skype: milessabin > http://www.chuusai.com/ > http://twitter.com/milessabin > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "JVM Languages" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en. > > > -- GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.
