On Monday, February 8, 2016 1:02:47 PM CET Alexander Dymo wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Martin Graesslin <mgraess...@kde.org> wrote: > > why you think KDE should not be a leader in future technologies. > > What are these future technologies? > I think you're just not convinced this is the future, right?
Sorry, I dont' have the capabilities to see what will be the future technologies. And I think neither do you. I consider it as likely that we will have a GUI less future, due to emerging technologies which I had already listed in another mail to show that a focus on GUI is not sufficient: * speech recognition * IoT * sensors But anyway I asked a question and would like to see an answer to it. > > > How do you convince me to continue to develop the desktop when I don't see > > a future for KDE due to not willing to go to the next thing? > > You've already listed several "things". Which ones from them do you > think are most important to work on? This was more a rhetorical question. Apparently it didn't make it through. I'm worried about your vision closing a path for the future. Your vision setting a focus on past technologies, which will result in stagnation, shrinking and death. I'm asking you why I as a developer should contribute my time for a dieing community? Cheers Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list kde-community@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community