Il giorno Wed, 05 Jul 2017 21:37:09 +0200 Martin Flöser <mgraess...@kde.org> ha scritto:
> To me the review process always felt weird and also like a relict > from other times. I contributed to overall KDE something like 100 k While projects with strong stewardship like KWin, Plasma or Krita (*not* implying there aren't others: I'm mentioning the ones that come to mind) ensure a continued review and code quality, how would you ensure that, without review periods (or anything that can subsitute them, if anything better) distributions and integrators don't get code dumps of dubious quality? I see this as a concrete risk. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team GPG key ID: A29D259B
pgp9LA4nDFjJa.pgp
Description: Firma digitale OpenPGP
