On Wed, 5 Jul 2017, Luca Beltrame wrote: > While projects with strong stewardship like KWin, Plasma or Krita > (*not* implying there aren't others: I'm mentioning the ones > that come to mind) ensure a continued review and code quality, how > would you ensure that, without review periods (or anything that can > subsitute them, if anything better) distributions and integrators don't > get code dumps of dubious quality?
I suck at code review, personally... I can only see what's wrong with code once I get a bug report and have to fix the code. -- Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.krita.org, http://www.valdyas.org
