On Monday, July 08, 2013 04:35:30 PM Àlex Fiestas wrote: > On Monday 08 July 2013 16:26:00 laurent Montel wrote: > > No it’s not a good idea because nobody tests branch you can see pb that we > > had when we merge akonadi branch (last big changes). > > So no develop in branch will just create more bugs. > > > > And same question: why reduce time by 2 ? > > > > What we will have as result ? Ok in january with will release 4.14 great, > > so it’s right we will never release a so big number of kde but don’t know > > if it’s a good idea to run after number... > > > > And when we reduce time for example for 4.12 which finish in october, for > > me for example I have 2 weeks of vacations => dev == 1 month 1/2 ! Great > > for create features... > > Then you can target your features for January (4.13) there is no pressure. > As I said before you can keep having 6 months schedule while others like > Frank (or myself) can release features based on 3 month schedule. > > You don't have to change the way you work because of this.
We've already experienced having some parts of the SC skip releases and it was a real problem from a distribution perspective. Please, let's not do it again. Scott K