El Dilluns, 8 de juliol de 2013, a les 11:25:42, Scott Kitterman va escriure: > On Monday, July 08, 2013 04:59:50 PM Àlex Fiestas wrote: > > On Monday 08 July 2013 10:40:21 Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > We've already experienced having some parts of the SC skip releases and > > > it > > > was a real problem from a distribution perspective. Please, let's not > > > do > > > it again. > > > > KDE-PIM will be released, just not with the features of those working with > > a 6 months release cycle. > > > > For example, in the case of 4.12 it will have (I hope) my kde-accounts > > integration but it might not have some of the features developed by > > Laurent > > (this is just an hypothetical example). > > I don't know how to reconcile that with what you said in the mail I was > > replying to (that you snipped): > > Then you can target your features for January (4.13) there is no pressure. > > As > > I said before you can keep having 6 months schedule while others like > > Frank > > (or myself) can release features based on 3 month schedule. > > > > You don't have to change the way you work because of this. > > Either they do have to change and do releases every three months or elements > of the SC get skipped on some releases. I don't see how you can have it > both ways.
* all the repositories get released * repositories only get features that are completed * If your feature will take more than 3 months to develop, you do it in a branch I don't see where's the problem and why elemens of the SC will need to skip some releases. Cheers, Albert > > Scott K
