On Thursday 23 July 2009 02:17:08 pm Stefan Teleman wrote: > stdcxx didn't make snv 120.
That's too bad. Well, better luck in some future even-numbered release. Is there any prognosis to be made, or is the best value to be obtained now from updating the specfiles again and submitting them to jucr? [ade] -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 489 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/kde-discuss/attachments/20090723/7295a2dd/attachment.bin>
