Stefan Teleman wrote: > Adriaan de Groot wrote: >> On Thursday 23 July 2009 02:17:08 pm Stefan Teleman wrote: >>> stdcxx didn't make snv 120. >> >> That's too bad. Well, better luck in some future even-numbered >> release. Is there any prognosis to be made, or is the best value to be >> obtained now from updating the specfiles again and submitting them to >> jucr? > > I'm now aiming for 121. Can't tell yet if it will make it or not.
If you don't mind sharing, what have been the obstacles to getting stdcxx in? Even though I don't use KDE, I am looking forward to a better C++ runtime libary. -- Shawn Walker
