Stefan Teleman wrote: > > First off: the *Apache* Standard C++ Library is not licensed under GPL, > but under the *Apache* License. > > Secondly: License Flamewars belong elsewhere.
I'm not particularly trying to flame, just curous as to why the Apache std C++ lib was chosen. > Thirdly: The Apache Standard C++ Library supports > NLS/multibyte/internationalization, unlike stlport4, which only supports > the "C" Locale. That looks like a good reason. I hope that the problems and limitations of libCstd (which as I'm sure you know is based on the same original Rogue Wave code) have been fixed. In particular the bad performance of std::string (I usually use QString instead if I can) and the issues with conformance. A+ Paul
