On Wednesday 04 September 2002 19:21, Pam R wrote: > On Wednesday 04 September 2002 1:02 pm, ?ric Bischoff wrote: > [snip] > > > But anyway, it was not my point. I was speaking about the English > > version. There are a few occurences where &LMB; or &RMB; could be used > > with no change in the result. > > Aaaah.., I understand now and have made the changes in cvs. Actually I > didn't change to &RMB; or whatever in a couple of places where > capitalisation is important, but overall it should now be ok.
Okay, thanks. Sorry for the misunderstanding. My message was unclear, and it provoked an unsuspectedly long thread, while the problem was rather simple ;-). -- ?ric Bischoff
