> On Jan. 17, 2014, 8:43 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > this would break my workflow given that I install kde4 and kf5 to different 
> > prefixes. I think this needs a different approach, but please don't ask me 
> > for it. I'm lacking ideas how we could solve this upstream.

What about just renaming xml files? Interfaces would be left compatible, and 
the files would not conflict. Only it would look a bit ugly, and possibly 
confusing...
(To my knowledge, there is no rule/spec that xml must match interface name, but 
that could be false ;-)


- Hrvoje


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115078/#review47614
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 17, 2014, 4:07 p.m., Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115078/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 17, 2014, 4:07 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Martin Gräßlin.
> 
> 
> Repository: kglobalaccel
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> don't install dbus interface files in kglobalaccel, these overlap with the 
> equivalent files in kdelibs4 which causes problems for some distributions
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   KF5GlobalAccelConfig.cmake.in 5f069d3 
>   src/CMakeLists.txt d48e92e 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115078/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jonathan Riddell
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to