> On Jan. 17, 2014, 8:43 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > this would break my workflow given that I install kde4 and kf5 to different 
> > prefixes. I think this needs a different approach, but please don't ask me 
> > for it. I'm lacking ideas how we could solve this upstream.
> 
> Hrvoje Senjan wrote:
>     What about just renaming xml files? Interfaces would be left compatible, 
> and the files would not conflict. Only it would look a bit ugly, and possibly 
> confusing...
>     (To my knowledge, there is no rule/spec that xml must match interface 
> name, but that could be false ;-)
> 
> Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark wrote:
>     I think the idea is to move the xml file to kde-workspace somehow?
> 
> Jonathan Riddell wrote:
>     @Gräßlin How would it break the workflow?  You can install kdelibs4 and 
> kf5 anywhere you like and it'll still compile fine.  But it won't overlap 
> files if they are installed to the same place with these changes.
>     
>     @sandsmark yes the files would be moved into kde-workspace, see patch in 
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115079/
> 
> Martin Gräßlin wrote:
>     How is a setup going to find the xml file to generate an interface from 
> if it doesn't get installed? A true KF5 setup shouldn't pick anything from 
> kdelibs4. By not installing it, things depending on it will be broken. Or am 
> I missing something?
> 
> Martin Gräßlin wrote:
>     Oh and I think review request https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115079/ 
> illustrates the problem. As the file doesn't get installed any more, we need 
> to copy it everywhere where it's going to be used. This looks like a very 
> sub-optimal solution.
> 
> Jonathan Riddell wrote:
>     The xml file would be included in the kde-workspace source directly ( 
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115079/ )

New patch follows Hrvoje Senjan's suggestion to rename the interface file but 
keep the interface name the same


- Jonathan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115078/#review47614
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 21, 2014, 2:49 p.m., Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115078/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 21, 2014, 2:49 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Martin Gräßlin.
> 
> 
> Repository: kglobalaccel
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> don't install dbus interface files in kglobalaccel, these overlap with the 
> equivalent files in kdelibs4 which causes problems for some distributions
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/org.kde.kglobalaccel.Component.xml ec21201 
>   src/org.kde.KGlobalAccel.xml 8746551 
>   src/kf5_org.kde.kglobalaccel.Component.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   src/kf5_org.kde.KGlobalAccel.xml PRE-CREATION 
>   src/CMakeLists.txt d48e92e 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115078/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jonathan Riddell
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to