> On Jan. 17, 2014, 5:39 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > and what if kdelibs (really, not kde-runtime?) from SC4 is not installed? > > KF/5 would be broken then, would it not? > > What about having a common data package downstream?
No it wouldn't be broken, it would continue to compile using the .xml files it has locally. - Jonathan ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115078/#review47587 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Jan. 17, 2014, 4:07 p.m., Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115078/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 17, 2014, 4:07 p.m.) > > > Review request for KDE Frameworks and Martin Gräßlin. > > > Repository: kglobalaccel > > > Description > ------- > > don't install dbus interface files in kglobalaccel, these overlap with the > equivalent files in kdelibs4 which causes problems for some distributions > > > Diffs > ----- > > KF5GlobalAccelConfig.cmake.in 5f069d3 > src/CMakeLists.txt d48e92e > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115078/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Jonathan Riddell > >
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel