Hi
plasma5 requires graphics/wayland [1] from [2] for the screenlocker component for example -- even for X11 based sessions [3]. (So by the same argument we could/should/have request[ed] graphics/wayland to be added to the ports tree :P -- wayland may be months out, but that port has been used for nearly two years now in the plasma5 branch). I'll create a diff for a patched plasma5-libkscreen for the ports tree. mfg Tobias [1] http://src.mouf.net/area51/browse/branches/plasma5/KDE/graphics/wayland [2] https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports-graphics/tree/wayland/graphics/wayland [3] https://blog.martin-graesslin.com/blog/2015/01/why-screen-lockers-on-x11-cannot-be-secure On 22 January 2017 at 16:46, Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 21:40:48 +0100 "Tobias C. Berner" < > tcber...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 19 January 2017 at 17:13, Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen > <jesper@schmitz.computer> > > wrote: > >> I've been working a little on LXQt (https://wiki.freebsd.org/LXQt) > >> LXQt only misses plasma5-libkscreen in the offical portstree to build in > >> the offical portstree. > >> > >> Therefore I patched plasma5-libkscreen [1] to build without wayland, e.g > >> commenting out the wayland specific parts in CMakeLists and by skipping > the > >> "doctor" subdir. It builds and work with lxqt-config. Just want to know > if > >> there is an interest to have lib/libKF5Screen.so in the offical tree > without > >> wayland support? > >> > >> 1 http://lxqt-freebsd.schmitz.computer/ \ > >> plasma5-libkscreen-port-without-wayland.tar.gz > > > > I added a slightly modified version of your idea to the plasma5 branch in > > r13609. > > > > I'm not quite sure if it is ideal to have just "bits" of plasma5 in the > > ports tree, when we cannot provide the whole desktop -- which we can't > > until wayland is in... But we should maybe think about it ^^ > > If libkscreen is the only thing blocking LXQt it should definitely be > added to the tree. > > Wayland on FreeBSD is still several months away I think so how critical is > it for plasma5? Surely it should work with a pure X11 system? >