On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 13:06:12 +0100 "Tobias C. Berner" <tcber...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 23 January 2017 at 13:01, Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 21:44:59 +0100 "Tobias C. Berner" >> <tcber...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> On 22 January 2017 at 16:46, Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>>> On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 21:40:48 +0100 "Tobias C. Berner" >>>> <tcber...@freebsd.org> wrote: >>>>> On 19 January 2017 at 17:13, Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen >>>>> <jesper@schmitz.computer> wrote: >>>>>> I've been working a little on LXQt (https://wiki.freebsd.org/LXQt) >>>>>> LXQt only misses plasma5-libkscreen in the offical portstree to >>>>>> build in the offical portstree. >>>>>> >>>>>> Therefore I patched plasma5-libkscreen [1] to build without wayland, >>>>>> e.g commenting out the wayland specific parts in CMakeLists and by >>>>>> skipping the "doctor" subdir. It builds and work with lxqt-config. >>>>>> Just want to know if there is an interest to have lib/libKF5Screen.so >>>>>> in the offical tree without wayland support? >>>>>> >>>>>> 1 http://lxqt-freebsd.schmitz.computer/ \ >>>>>> plasma5-libkscreen-port-without-wayland.tar.gz >>>>> >>>>> I added a slightly modified version of your idea to the plasma5 branch >>>>> in r13609. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not quite sure if it is ideal to have just "bits" of plasma5 in the >>>>> ports tree, when we cannot provide the whole desktop -- which we can't >>>>> until wayland is in... But we should maybe think about it ^^ >>>> >>>> If libkscreen is the only thing blocking LXQt it should definitely be >>>> added to the tree. >>>> >>>> Wayland on FreeBSD is still several months away I think so how critical >>>> is it for plasma5? Surely it should work with a pure X11 system? >>> >>> plasma5 requires graphics/wayland [1] from [2] for the screenlocker >>> component for example -- even for X11 based sessions [3]. (So by the same >>> argument we could/should/have request[ed] graphics/wayland to be added to >>> the ports tree :P -- wayland may be months out, but that port has been >>> used for nearly two years now in the plasma5 branch). >>> >>> I'll create a diff for a patched plasma5-libkscreen for the ports tree. >> >> Is the graphics/wayland port the only thing you need? Because that looks >> like a very simple component. It should definitely be added to the tree >> if that's the only thing blocking plasma5, and then you don't need this >> libkscreen hack. > > yes :) -- I don't think we imported anything else into our plasma5 branch.
Bapt, can you look into (and commit) graphics/wayland? It's the only thing blocking KDE5.