yes :) -- I don't think we imported anything else into our plasma5 branch.
mfg Tobias On 23 January 2017 at 13:01, Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jan 2017 21:44:59 +0100 "Tobias C. Berner" < > tcber...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 22 January 2017 at 16:46, Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 21:40:48 +0100 "Tobias C. Berner" < > tcber...@freebsd.org> wrote: > >>> On 19 January 2017 at 17:13, Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen > <jesper@schmitz.computer> wrote: > >>>> I've been working a little on LXQt (https://wiki.freebsd.org/LXQt) > >>>> LXQt only misses plasma5-libkscreen in the offical portstree to build > in > >>>> the offical portstree. > >>>> > >>>> Therefore I patched plasma5-libkscreen [1] to build without wayland, > e.g > >>>> commenting out the wayland specific parts in CMakeLists and by > skipping > >>>> the "doctor" subdir. It builds and work with lxqt-config. Just want to > >>>> know if there is an interest to have lib/libKF5Screen.so in the > offical > >>>> tree without wayland support? > >>>> > >>>> 1 http://lxqt-freebsd.schmitz.computer/ \ > >>>> plasma5-libkscreen-port-without-wayland.tar.gz > >>> > >>> I added a slightly modified version of your idea to the plasma5 branch > >>> in r13609. > >>> > >>> I'm not quite sure if it is ideal to have just "bits" of plasma5 in the > >>> ports tree, when we cannot provide the whole desktop -- which we can't > >>> until wayland is in... But we should maybe think about it ^^ > >> > >> If libkscreen is the only thing blocking LXQt it should definitely be > >> added to the tree. > >> > >> Wayland on FreeBSD is still several months away I think so how critical > >> is it for plasma5? Surely it should work with a pure X11 system? > > > > plasma5 requires graphics/wayland [1] from [2] for the screenlocker > > component for example -- even for X11 based sessions [3]. (So by the same > > argument we could/should/have request[ed] graphics/wayland to be added to > > the ports tree :P -- wayland may be months out, but that port has been > > used for nearly two years now in the plasma5 branch). > > > > I'll create a diff for a patched plasma5-libkscreen for the ports tree. > > Is the graphics/wayland port the only thing you need? Because that looks > like a very simple component. It should definitely be added to the tree > if that's the only thing blocking plasma5, and then you don't need this > libkscreen hack. >