On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:03:35PM -0200, Andreas Hasenack wrote: > > > LDAP > > > services aren't really a distinct category. You might run > > > several LDAP services on the same host whose data and access > > > controls are completely different, and that's what you would > > I though ACLs were not kerberos' concern. Kerberos only says > that you are you, right? What you can or cannot do outside of > kerberos is not its business, right?
How should a client distinguish between two *different* LDAP databases using the same service principal name? I think each LDAP DB should have a unique service principal name. Most times ldap/fqdn@REALM will do, but if you're running two different LDAP DBs on the same host you'd have to use a different service princ name for at least one of them, which means that the clients have to be somewhat configurable with respect to Kerberos service principal names for LDAP servers. Cheers, Nico -- -DISCLAIMER: an automatically appended disclaimer may follow. By posting- -to a public e-mail mailing list I hereby grant permission to distribute- -and copy this message.- Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This message is provided for informational purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments.
