On 3/22/06, Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 March 2006 14:29, Vincent Panel wrote:
> > On 3/22/06, Pascal Terjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 3/22/06, Vincent Panel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > I might be able to do this (with dkms-ndiswrapper) on my box at home
> > > > > (running 2006.0 with a wifi card whose "native" drivers are pretty
> > > > > unstable when doing Ad-hoc).
> > > >
> > > > You mean you would create a dkms-ndiswrapper package for 2006 ? In
> > > > this case, many thanks because I don't really want to run cooker on my
> > > > SMP laptop (only for work).
> > >
> > > dkms packages are usually quite independant from the distrib version
> > > (that's the goal of dkms).
> >
> > Oh thanks ! it works : I downloaded ndiswrapper and the
> > dkms-ndiswrapper packages and I now have wifi with my SMP laptop.
> > Great ! I'll update the bug with this piece of information. I still
> > think backporting is needed, however.
>
> Anything more than the packages I have provided?

No, nothing more. I didn't know you had already built a dkms for 2006
at the time I wrote the mail. Damn, I should have used it instead of
the cooker package... I'll uninstall the cooker one and install yours.

> The problem with any other option (eg uploading to devel/2006.0), is that we
> would force-upgrade all ndiswrapper users to 1.6 (and dkms-ndiswrapper).
That's what I had in mind. You're right, we shouldn't force all users
to upgrade to a package in contrib (if I understand correctly the
reason behind), but could we force-upgrade SMP users only  (which
don't have ndiswrapper at all currently) ?

Reply via email to