I feel the more you implement in C(++), the more you have to worry about
crossing the barrier between C and Java. The barrier is the tough part,
particularly for GC, and difficult to make efficient.
Roland
-----Original Message-----
From: Hilary Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 20 June 1999 03:46
Subject: Re: [JOS-Kernel] Linux kernel as the JOS kernel
>I am new in this list too. Hm, In My Opinion, I think using Linux Kernel is
good
>idea.
>Since Linux Kernel already have disk access, memory management. I think
this is
>not
>urgent tasks for JOS to implemenet it. Also, these things are not related
to Java
>Itself.
>Anyone got idea about it?
>
>"Dmitry M. Golubovsky" wrote:
>
>> From: "Dmitry M. Golubovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm new in this list. As I found at the JOS site there exist some
separate
>> projects to develop native kernels for Java OS (probably such an OS
cannot
>> exist without some native part). Has someone tried to build a
Java-oriented OS
>> as a combination of some existing Linux kernel (maybe patched) and one of
>> known free JVMs (Kaffe for example)?
>>
>> Also does someone know if there exist purchaseable hardware Java
accelerators
>> for PC (Picojava chip had been announced by SUN some years ago), what is
a
>> price of such an unit and if such things exist how are those taken into
>> consideration within the JOS development process?
>>
>> Dmitry M. Golubovsky
>> St-Petersburg, Russia
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kernel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> http://jos.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Kernel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://jos.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
>
_______________________________________________
Kernel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jos.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
