Hi,
That's what I concern. The Best Case that Graphics Driver should be A
GENERIC DRIVER
for all kernel that are avaible. Since current Graphics Driver are depends
on the JJOS API. We
tempoary put it into JJOS. But I would like to ask all people's idea about
packaging.
Regards,
Hilary
Ryan Heise wrote:
> Hilary Cheng wrote:
>
> > Also, will Graphics Drivers are under JJOS Modules ?
>
> The CVS filesystem was designed so that all Java code is stored in the
> jos/library module. I know jm and _Quinn have been putting Java in JJOS
> but I figure that's fine for now since the code they're writing is (at
> the moment) closely tied to how JJOS works.
>
> There are other JOS kernels being developed. Once more progress happens
> in the Java layer of JOS, we should think about writing a standard set
> of classes in /jos/library that is common to all kernels.
>
> {{ Note that package names don't include /jos/library. eg. org.jos.ui
> will be stored in /jos/library/org/jos/ui }}
>
_______________________________________________
Kernel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jos.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
