On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 21:21 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:24:13PM -0700, Piet Delaney wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 21:12 -0700, Larry McVoy wrote: > > > > Perhaps the bitkeeper 2.6.*-kgdb-stable repositories: > > > > http://linux.bkbits.net/ > > > > would be a easy way to maintain kgdb support for a series > > of releases. > > I'm sorry, but I don't have any interest in setting up a BitKeeper tree > for KGDB. At this point in time I'm looking for a little bit of time, > and a chance to setup a stacked git repository for KGDB as this should > allow us to keep everything as individual patches still, yet easily sync > with mainline, which is our biggest headache at the moment.
Why so much interest in individual patches? For two releases I've tried just applying the i386 part of the series just to have path rejecting parts of patches. Once kgdb is part of the kernel I don't see much need for it and IMHO seems to just make it more difficult to patch the kernel. -piet > > Nothing against BitKeeper or anything as I spent much time using it, > wearing my PPC guy hat. > -- Piet Delaney BlueLane Teck W: (408) 200-5256; [EMAIL PROTECTED] H: (408) 243-8872; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Kgdb-bugreport mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport
