Oh, I just encoumtered the same problem! But first I thought it was just the 
component reference (R1,C1 ...) that was printed on the top of the SMD-pads, 
and that is possible to disable, but with a fairly complicated board I don't 
want to miss that information. It seems like I have to move all the module's 
reference text aside as well as editing some of the modules.

I've made quite a few boards by now, but have always etched them myself, 
printing the silkscreen on a paper as a guide for mounting. This is the first 
time I will hand the making of the PCB over to a manifacturer and suddenly 
there are a lot of things to think about.

Bob: Did you edit all of your SMD modules? Can you share it? I will start 
editing mine right now, but why should everyone have to do the same job again 
and again? 

While editing the modules, it is a good idea to move the module reference text 
to the side as well so it can be printed on the board, isn't it?

--- In [email protected], "mmabshaffer" <bob.shaf...@...> wrote:
>
> Robert,
> 
> Ok then, that's what I'll do. 
> Thanks,
> Bob
> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], Robert <birmingham_spider@> wrote:
> >
> > Ah, yes, some of the supplied footprints do have that problem, and the 
> > only fix is indeed to edit the footprint (saving it into your own 
> > library so it doesn't get replaced with the defective footprint when you 
> > update kicad).   The problem lies (AFAIK) entirely with the additional 
> > silk screen elements (lines, arcs, and text) defined by the footprint, 
> > not with the silk screen component of the pads.   The "Print pads on 
> > silkscreen" option turns on or off the silk screen component of the 
> > pads, which is why it doesn't solve the problem for you.
> > 
> > But at least whilst you're editing all those footprints you can at the 
> > same time sort out anything else that bugs you about the footprint 
> > design, such as text size and visibility :).
> > 
> > Robert.
> > 
> > mmabshaffer wrote:
> > > Robert and Martin..
> > > 
> > > I did uncheck the "Print pads on silkscreen" option and it made no 
> > > difference. Its not the pad outlines that are my concern, its the outline 
> > > of the component itself that overlaps the pad that I'm trying to get rid 
> > > off.
> > > 
> > > I'm using a version of PCNew called "2008082C-final". Should I be using a 
> > > newer version?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Bob
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], Robert <birmingham_spider@> wrote:
> > >> If you uncheck the option "Print pads on silkscreen" when plotting the 
> > >> Gerbers the pad silk screen is not plotted.   Much simpler than editing 
> > >> all the libraries!
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >> Robert.
> > >>
> > >> kajdas wrote:
> > >>> I guess it all depends on what the PCB manufacturer does but in my case 
> > >>> the pads are not silk-screened so there is no harm. It also makes sense 
> > >>> to me that pads should not be silk-screened.
> > >>> Martin
> > >>>
> > >>> ---- mmabshaffer <bob.shaffer@> wrote: 
> > >>>> Martin,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I looked at the gerber files and the unwanted lines are there! Please 
> > >>>> look at one of your gerbers and see if they have the unwanted lines 
> > >>>> also. 
> > >>>> Bob
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --- In [email protected], kajdas <kajdas@> wrote:
> > >>>>> I used these parts before and the way I understand it is:
> > >>>>> that the pads do not get silk-screened so it does not matter.
> > >>>>> Fixing them will not change anything(?).
> > >>>>> Martin
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> ---- mmabshaffer <bob.shaffer@> wrote: 
> > >>>>>> I have noticed that many footprints in the library include 
> > >>>>>> silkscreen component outlines that cover that component pad. This 
> > >>>>>> seems like a problem to me. Before I edit all the library footprints 
> > >>>>>> to remove these component outline I thought I would check with this 
> > >>>>>> group of users to see if I'm missing a concept. An example of such a 
> > >>>>>> footprint is the "-1206" footprint in the "ref-packages.mod" library.
> > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>  Bob
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ------------------------------------
> > >>>
> > >>> Please read the Kicad FAQ in the group files section before posting 
> > >>> your question.
> > >>> Please post your bug reports here. They will be picked up by the 
> > >>> creator of Kicad.
> > >>> Please visit http://www.kicadlib.org for details of how to contribute 
> > >>> your symbols/modules to the kicad library.
> > >>> For building Kicad from source and other development questions visit 
> > >>> the kicad-devel group at 
> > >>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kicad-develYahoo! Groups Links
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> No virus found in this incoming message.
> > >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> > >>> Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.65/2324 - Release Date: 
> > >>> 08/24/09 06:05:00
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> > >> Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.65/2324 - Release Date: 
> > >> 08/24/09 12:55:00
> > >>
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ------------------------------------
> > > 
> > > Please read the Kicad FAQ in the group files section before posting your 
> > > question.
> > > Please post your bug reports here. They will be picked up by the creator 
> > > of Kicad.
> > > Please visit http://www.kicadlib.org for details of how to contribute 
> > > your symbols/modules to the kicad library.
> > > For building Kicad from source and other development questions visit the 
> > > kicad-devel group at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kicad-develYahoo! 
> > > Groups Links
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 
> > > 
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> > > Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.66/2325 - Release Date: 
> > > 08/25/09 06:08:00
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> > Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.66/2325 - Release Date: 08/25/09 
> > 06:08:00
> >
>


Reply via email to