On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:18:11PM -0700, Randall Shimizu wrote:
> I am amazed that this lawsuit has dragged on so long.
> It was clear from the very beginning that SCO was
> unwilling and unable to produce tangible evidence to
> back up it's claims.
>
> I hope that SCO is forced to compensate IBM for this
> nonsensical lawsuit.
>
> Checkout (http://www.groklaw.net/ ). For complete
> info...
>
Everybody deserves and gets his day in court. We all tend to focus on
the obvious abuses of that process (like SCO), but I think in the end it
sorts out. Judges are loath to dismiss without giving plaintiffs every
possible chance to make their case, but they're not stupid.
I'm convinced that most lawyers (and judges come from the lawyer pool)
start out in their training with at least a little part of them being
star-struck by the love of Justice. Very few (we'll call them the "Tom
Hagens") start out to use the law to rip people off.
Anyway, this case seems to have worked out.
--
Lan Barnes
Linux Guy, SCM Specialist
Tcl/Tk Enthusiast
Invading and occupying Iraq after 9/11 made about as much sense as if
after Pearl Harbor, the United States had bombed Brazil.
- Mark Shields
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
