Stewart Stremler wrote:
begin quoting Michael J McCafferty as of Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 08:35:57PM -0700:
So, a few months ago i went through quite a bit of work to get our HTML
on our site all cleaned up and validated. 99% of the pages are 100%
validated with the W3C validator (4.01 Transitional).
Think of this as a spell checker. Just because it comes back with "okay"
doesn't mean that you're done.
In addition, you validated it against the absolute loosest of the HTML's.
I tend to validate against the strongest. This means that I have to
actually explicitly close elements (I can't count on the implicit
closes), make sure that the nesting is correct, and close individual
elements (like <br />).
Even HTML Frameset is complaining about that HTML, let alone HTML Strict.
Try to go for HTML strict compliance, but then advertise HTML
Transitional. It seems to be the best way.
I would ask why you aren't doing CSS. Especially if customers might
want to, say, check on the status of their servers via their cell phone.
-a
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
