Bob La Quey wrote:
PS. I am still waiting for anyone to address the point
I made earlier. Fires are easily extinguished if they
are detected early before they grow to be huge conflagrations.
There is existing technology for detecting fires within
minutes of their initiation. SoCal is not using it. Why?
I wish you guys would say, "Hey Bob, you are an idiot."
Well, you didn't actually provide us with anything concrete one way or
another. If I'm going to call you an idiot, I'd at least like to have a
reason.
Instead you ignore any attack on the fundamental problem
and simply get into the political bureaucratic circus that
follows ... Lemmings, lemmings, more damn lemmings.
Increasingly I wonder why I spend any time here. Once I
though this was a group capable of thought. Even occasionally
capable of innovative thought. Increasingly I realize that
all I am doing is wasting time here.
Your turn for the pills, Bob.
Lan asked you very nicely (especially for Lan!) for references about
firefighting detection and efficacy. He even provided some starting links.
You have provided none in return.
Before you complain about others not thinking, perhaps you should
provide a few facts for us to actually think *about*?
I was actually looking forward to your links (distributed detection and
economically viable response is an interesting topic) and am a bit
disappointed that you haven't provided any.
-a
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
