David Brown wrote:
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 09:55:52AM -0700, James G. Sack (jim) wrote:
¡¢£¤¥¦§¨©ª«¬®¯°±²³´µ¶·¸¹º»¼½¾¿ÀÁÂÃÄÅÆÇÈÉÊËÌÍÎÏÐÑÒÓÔÕÖ×ØÙÚÛÜÝÞßàáâãäåæçèéêëìíîïðñòóôõö÷øùúûüýþÿ
Now that you can use UTF-8, does that mean you can reply to this,
without the text turning into gibberish?
Ugh. Mutt has decided that since this can be entirely encoded as
iso-latin-1, it will. So, I have to insert an obligatory higher UTF-8
character: • to force the message to be UTF-8.
I confirm that I received it as UTF-8, and it appears to display all the
characters properly, and in a decent font now.
And tBird is telling me that this outgoing message is UTF-8 also, and
the characters appear to be unchanged. But I don't think it was my
replies that were changing the text. I think it was someone else.
This is interesting. I just responded to Todd's reply, and his was not
UTF-8. His had changed the © and ® symbols to (c) and (r) and sent it
out as Western (ISO-8859-1). I didn't pay attention, but I wonder what
other things got changed in his mail program.
--
Ralph
--------------------
A Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every
government and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference.
--Thomas Jefferson
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
