Yes I am sure now I have to open my eyes more and pay attention to which print I am looking at. I have seperated and put the KR2 plans on the wall on one side of the shop and the KR2S on the wall on the other side. So now hopefully I will make sure I look at both walls and compare! Hahhahah. Mark Jones answered another DUH question for me the other day. So I will look closer now and ask the DUH questions only after I have gone over all the prints.
No pride here. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Langford" <n5...@hiwaay.net> To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 6:53 PM Subject: Re: KR>Airfoil wingtip question > Steve McGee wrote: > > >> Was wondering if anyone knew why we gave up 3" in length (surface area > also) on the new airfoils at the out board ends. I am referring to the 33" > to the stock 36" length. Stock vrs. AS5046 - 33"<< > > I guess you'll have to explain your problem in greater detail, because I > don't understand it. The RR KR2S plans show the template at the end of the > spars to be 33" long, just like the AS5046 drawing. The KR2 had a 36" long > template at the end of it's spars, so I guess maybe you should ask whoever > "designed" the KR2S why they stole your wing area. But the wings were also > made 12" longer for the KR2S (by way of the hoaky foam spar extensions) so I > suspect no crime has actually been committed after all. If you don't own a > set of KR2S plans (which include the KR2 plans), perhaps you should get > some. The details are shown clearly on the sheet labeled "Wing Details". > > I'm sort of surprised that nobody else bothered to answer this one all day, > as obvious as it is... > > Mark Langford, Huntsville, AL > N56ML "at" hiwaay.net > see KR2S project at http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford > > > > _______________________________________________ > see KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html > >
