John Martindale wrote: > Does anyone out there have experience with these things?
I have one and I love it! I was doing some engine testing yesterday and marveled over how handy it was to know exactly what was going on with the engine. Now that my engine is running perfectly, the mixture gauge immediately tells me why it running "rough" (that's slightly less than perfectly smooth) by indicating either rich or lean. It's a lot faster than trying to decipher the EGT display, and the response is almost instant. I heard the sensor will last 100 hours, but David's experience calls that into serious question. As has been mentioned, the type or brand makes a difference, and I'll bet the location matters too. Sounds like some experimentation is in order! It's a simple enough exercise to weld another bung in place, so I may move mine around a little, once I do some internet research and figure out where the best sensor location normally is. There are several photos at http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford/corvair/first_runs/ that show my meter, as well as the O2 sensor (a $30 Bosch one-wire) installed in the exhaust pipe. I highly recommend one! Steve Makish has one and he wouldn't part with it either. In other news, my engine is running great now (put a "new" head on the pilot's side), with EGTs all in the same neighborhood, and pulls 3000 rpm with the repitched Sterba 54x66 (whatever that makes it now). It's probably still a little too much pitch, but I can certainly fly with it and find out! John will be interested to know that 3000 is exactly what it would pull with the Weber, so the Weber is no worse than the high dollar Ellison. Mark Langford, Huntsville, Alabama see KR2S project N56ML at http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford email to N56ML "at" hiwaay.net --------------------------------------------------------------
