--- Mark Langford <n5...@hiwaay.net> wrote: > You may have missed the fact that this law was not > "in effect for many > years", but was enacted in the last week or so, > especially to deal with > Brian,
Again, I'd like to hear the other side of the story. If Brian has several airplane projects in his yard, and is operating as a business out of a residential unit, then the city is just reacting to it's inability to stop said activity with their existing laws. All of these are "if's", not speculation on my part. Here's somthing to ruffle feathers: If Brian has been operating a business out of his house, as the address on his website suggests, then the city's new law to prevent this is a direct result of Brian's actions, ie: circumventing existing ordinances. If THAT is the case, then we all don't have the city to blame for such restrictive new laws, but rather the lack of cooperation on the part of one memebr of that city. It's like this: There are many new laws restricting where motorcycles can be ridden,most of which were the direct result of motorcycles with loud exhaust pipes pissing people off with all the noise. So, who do we blame? The people who make the laws, or Mr. Loudpipe and his ignorance of his neighbor's right to peace? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
