I'll be interested to know

GR


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dan Morehouse" <messyd...@yahoo.com>
To: <kr...@mylist.net>
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2010 12:02 AM
Subject: KR> Mil-spec 6073 vs. any other wood


> I've been reading articles about selecting and testing wood. Lots of good 
> info.
> Besides Sitka Spruce, Port Orford Cedar, Alaskan Yellow Cedar and Hemlock 
> are
> rated as good choices for airplanes. In fact, Eugene Parker wrote an 
> article for
> EAA in 1984(?) in which he ranked Sitka Spruce 3rd in his list of best 
> wood for
> airplanes, POC was number one, AYC was two. Googling POC comes up with
> BearCreekLumber.com. They're a half day's drive from me and quoted Sitka 
> Spruce
> to be 25% more expensive than any of the other three. But this isn't 
> mil-spec
> lumber. As I understand it, they can get very nice wood, but it would be 
> up to
> me to inspect and test it. I read on this board  how Harold Woods suggests 
> going
> about testing each piece by getting them a bit overwidth, ripping a piece 
> the
> full length of the board on both edges, and testing those pieces. Sounds
> straight forward, but does that mean it's as good as mil spec 6073?
>
> So if I buy from ACS or Wicks, I'll get mil spec 6073, which means that 
> some
> knowledgeable person thought this wood would be okay in an airplane. And 
> if I
> buy this mil spec wood, do I still need to go through all the elaborate 
> testing?
> If so, I'd end up with skinnier than called for wood, assuming they sell 
> it in
> the exact width called for.
>
> I'm all for saving money and it would be neat to build with POC, if it's 
> really
> top of the line. But I'm concerned that I may not be able to guarantee, 
> even by
> inspection and testing, that this uncertified wood is as good or better 
> than
> what a professional inspector has already deemed mil spec 6073 worthy. 
> I've
> never inspected wood in this manner and don't know how reliable my tests 
> would
> be. If buying certified wood removes all doubt about it's quality, the 
> several
> hundred dollars extra I'd pay for this may be worth it.
>
> How did you guys go about buying, inspecting, and testing your wood?
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
> _______________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 1435/3334 - Release Date: 12/23/10
> 

Reply via email to