Larry, do you have contacted information for Jeanette ? Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 17, 2022, at 10:30 AM, patr...@gmcmotorhome.com wrote: > > Read this again Jamie. There are no new plans available from Jeanette. > > My take is that Jeanette is in her 90's now and she's done. Apparently, no > one in the family is interested in the business. I'm not sure why Jeanette > wouldn't sell the rights or transfer them to a foundation. Maybe after her > demise, the family will do something along those lines. > > Patrick > >> On 2022-01-17 09:22, Jamie Lockhart via KRnet wrote: >> How does one get a hold of this Jeanette about buying plans ? >> Sent from my iPhone >>>> On Jan 17, 2022, at 10:14 AM, Flesner <fles...@frontier.com> wrote: >>> On 1/16/2022 11:11 PM, John Martindale wrote: >>>> Buy a set of plans from Jeanette like the rest of us have. Support her as >>>> she has us over the decades. >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> To eliminate any confusion I'll state it one more time, directly from >>> Jeanette rand on 1/16/2022. >>> No one, including Steve Glover, is authorized by Rand Robinson (Jeanette >>> Rand) to sell plans created by Rand Robinson to the KR series of aircraft. >>> Steve Glover never owned the "copyright" but was authorized by Rand to sell >>> copies of plans produced by Rand. That is no longer the case. Jeanette's >>> words were "the plans are off the market" and I'm retired". Jeanette has >>> no problem with Steve selling parts or supporting the design in any way >>> other than selling plans. >>> While we may personally agree or disagree with that decision it is the >>> reality we face. While I personally don't see a great liability issue >>> given 50 years of KR crashes, deaths, and injuries, without any lawsuits >>> that I'm aware of, it's not my bank account they would come after. I >>> suspect it wouldn't be hard to prove that any KR flying was not "built to >>> plans" to avoid liability but again, I have no skin in the game. >>> On the other hand I personally see no legal issues in someone selling an >>> unused set of KR plans. You did not sign away your right of transfer of >>> personal property and I can sell my entire KR, built to plans, sort of, if >>> I chose. >>> Finally, I don't expect to see any legal issues, other than someone >>> producing and selling new sets of plans, with anything that anyone does >>> with unused plans they own. What legal issue is being violated? IMHO...... >>> I also don't see a problem with someone producing an entirely new set of >>> plans to a new aircraft incorporating all the changes and calling it a >>> Gismo 2 and selling those plans. All aircraft have the same parts, wings, >>> tail, fuselage, spars, landing gear, engines, etc., it's just the >>> proportions that change. Any substantial change makes it a new and >>> different aircraft. >>> Value my "opinions" by the price you paid for them. >>> Larry Flesner > ________________________________ > -Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html > -Change list delivery options at > https://list.krnet.org/list/krnet.list.krnet.org/ Affinity List Info Board > -Search recent KRnet Archives at > https://list.krnet.org/empathy/list/krnet.list.krnet.org/ > -Search John Bouyea's decades of archive at > https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/ ________________________________ -Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html -Change list delivery options at https://list.krnet.org/list/krnet.list.krnet.org/ Affinity List Info Board -Search recent KRnet Archives at https://list.krnet.org/empathy/list/krnet.list.krnet.org/ -Search John Bouyea's decades of archive at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/
